Understanding FSMA: A Complete Guide for Global Food Producers

About 48 million Americans – roughly one in six – get sick from foodborne illness each year. The FSMA was enacted to address this problem. FSMA stands for the Food Safety Modernization Act, a sweeping U.S. federal law that shifts the national food safety system from reacting to outbreaks toward preventing them ​(fda.gov). Congress passed FSMA in response to dramatic changes in the global food system and a growing awareness that preventable foodborne illness posed a major public health and economic threat​(fda.gov).

President Barack Obama signed FSMA into law on January 4, 2011. The law gave the FDA a range of new authorities over food production and imports, including, for example, the power to order mandatory recalls of unsafe products – a tool the agency sought for many years.

Congress considered FSMA as the first major overhaul of U.S. food-safety law in decades, with numerous outbreaks (such as E. coli on leafy greens and salmonella in peanut butter) highlighting gaps in food safety, in the years leading up to FSMA. These incidents cost the industry billions of dollars and thousands of illnesses​. FSMA was crafted to modernise the federal approach: it is in fact the first significant food safety legislation in the US since 1938, focusing on preventive controls, science-based standards, and clear accountability across the supply chain.

FSMA’s core purpose is to prevent contamination rather than merely respond to it​.

To achieve this, FSMA establishes a “shared responsibility” approach: every point in the farm-to-table chain must take specific steps to keep food safe​ (fda.gov). In practice, that means new requirements for farms, processors, shippers, importers, and others (as we’ll detail below). For example, FSMA explicitly directs producers to identify potential hazards and implement controls at each stage, and it obligates importers to verify the safety practices of their foreign suppliers. In short, FSMA creates a preventive food safety framework for both domestic and imported food, with the goal of reducing foodborne illness in the United States ​(fda.gov).

 A lettuce grower in the field – FSMA’s Produce Safety Rule introduced mandatory safety standards for farm fields (e.g. irrigation water quality, worker hygiene, and equipment sanitation) for fresh fruits and vegetables. This is an example of FSMA moving food safety controls upstream to the farm level.

The Seven FSMA Rules

FSMA is implemented through seven major final rules that cover the entire food chain. Each rule targets a specific sector or activity. Collectively, these rules are a “science- and risk-based approach” to food safety​. In summary, the seven FSMA rules are:

• Produce Safety Rule: Sets the first-ever mandatory standards for growing, harvesting, packing, and holding fruits and vegetables likely to be eaten raw​. It addresses risks like agricultural water quality, wildlife intrusion, worker health/sanitation, and use of animal manures.

• Accredited Third-Party Certification: Establishes a framework for FDA to recognize third-party auditors and certification bodies that can audit foreign food facilities​. Certified audits may be used by FDA to expedite or mandate inspection of imports.

• Preventive Controls for Human Food: Requires domestic food processors (and some farms that sell a lot off-farm) to maintain modernized Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs) and to develop, implement and validate written hazard analysis and preventive controls plans. Each plan must identify food safety hazards (biological, chemical, physical) and include controls to reduce them, plus monitoring, corrective actions, verification and a recall plan​.

• Preventive Controls for Animal Food: Applies the same concepts to pet food and livestock feed​. Facilities producing animal food must likewise follow CGMPs and have a written hazard analysis and preventive controls (HARPC) plan with a recall strategy.

• Sanitary Transportation: Requires shippers, loaders, carriers and receivers to follow sanitary practices when transporting human or animal food by land into the U.S.​. The rule covers vehicle/equipment cleanliness, temperature control, training, and documentation of transportation conditions​.

• Foreign Supplier Verification Programs (FSVP): Holds U.S. importers responsible for verifying that their foreign suppliers are producing food in accordance with U.S. safety standards​. Importers must evaluate their suppliers’ hazard controls, conduct supplier audits or testing, maintain records of verification, and take corrective action when needed.

• Mitigation Strategies for Intentional Adulteration: Requires large food facilities to develop and implement a food defense plan to address the threat of deliberate contamination (e.g. economically motivated adulteration). Covered companies must identify potential vulnerabilities and adopt measures to reduce those risks​.

FDA has finalized these seven rules to clarify the preventive actions needed at each point in the global supply chain​. (FSMA also includes a Food Traceability rule and a Laboratory Accreditation rule that complement the above, as discussed below.)

FSMA Compliance Requirements

Under the FSMA rules listed above, food businesses must meet several core requirements:

• Facility Registration: All domestic and foreign firms that manufacture, process, pack or hold food for U.S. consumption must register with the FDA and update that registration periodically. (In fact, registration renewal is required every two years in even-numbered years​.) A failure to register or renew can itself be a prohibited act leading to regulatory action.

• Written Hazard Analysis & Preventive Controls Plan: Businesses subject to the Preventive Controls rules must develop and maintain a written food safety plan. This Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls (HARPC) plan documents identified food safety hazards and specifies controls to manage them. The plan must be implemented, monitored, verified, and updated as needed. A written recall plan is also required for each facility​.

• Current Good Manufacturing Practices (CGMPs): All covered facilities must follow modernized CGMPs for human or animal food (as applicable), covering sanitation, facility maintenance, worker hygiene, and equipment. These form the baseline standards that support preventive controls.

• Supply-Chain and Foreign Supplier Verification: If your product requires controls that are handled by suppliers (for example, specialty ingredients controlled upstream), you must have a documented supply-chain program. In particular, U.S. importers must have an FSVP plan as noted above​, ensuring their foreign suppliers’ practices are equivalent to U.S. requirements.

• Produce Safety (if applicable): Farms growing produce for export must comply with the Produce Safety Rule’s standards (which may include testing of agricultural water, maintaining farm maps, recordkeeping of growing practices, etc.).

• Sanitary Transportation Plan: Companies that transport food (e.g. trucking firms, carriers) into the U.S. must have a written sanitary transportation plan to ensure vehicles, containers, and operations meet hygiene requirements​.

• Food Defence Plan: Large registered facilities must also have a written mitigation strategy (food defence plan) for protection against intentional contamination​.

• Recordkeeping: FDA requires thorough recordkeeping for all FSMA activities. This includes keeping monitoring logs, corrective action records, verification and validation data, supplier qualification records, and other documentation. These records must be maintained (often for at least 2 years) and made available for FDA inspection. Notably, the new FSMA traceability rule requires that for foods on the Food Traceability List, businesses must maintain records of specific Key Data Elements (KDEs) at each Critical Tracking Event (such as harvest, shipping, packing)​. In other words, you need to be able to trace certain foods quickly through the supply chain.

• Traceability: Companies should use lot codes and detailed batch records so they can track product through each step. FSMA’s traceability requirements (see below) are in line with industry best practices for quick traceback.

• Training: Key personnel (e.g. those responsible for the food safety plan) should be trained to be a “Preventive Controls Qualified Individual” (PCQI). FDA-recognized training programs (such as those from the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance) exist to certify PCQIs for human and animal food.

  
  

In summary, any company that produces or ships food to the U.S. market must evaluate which FSMA rules apply and take action accordingly. This means implementing HACCP/HARPC principles, updating sanitation practices, and keeping robust documentation at every step.

Who Needs FSMA Compliance?

FSMA’s scope is broad. FDA emphasizes that food safety is a shared responsibility across the global supply chain​ (fda.gov). In practical terms:

• Domestic Producers/Processors: Almost any U.S. business that manufactures, processes, packs or holds food for human or animal consumption in the U.S. is covered by FSMA rules (unless a very small “qualified facility” exemption applies). This includes farms that ship produce, mills that grind flour, bakeries, beverage makers, pet food manufacturers, etc.

• Importers and Foreign Suppliers: U.S. importers of food for human or animal consumption must comply with FSMA (primarily through the FSVP rule​). In other words, foreign exporters to the U.S. are indirectly covered – their U.S. customers must verify that the product was made according to FSMA standards. Many U.S. buyers now request formal assurance (or a supplier’s FSMA compliance statement) before importing.

• Exemptions: Some small-scale operations are exempt or have modified requirements. For example, farms with very low sales (generally ≤ $500,000/year and mostly selling directly to local consumers) may be exempt from certain preventive controls. However, these exemptions are narrow. Any food business targeting the U.S. market should carefully check FSMA definitions.

• Transportation and Logistics Firms: Companies that carry food by land (such as trucking companies moving food into the U.S.) fall under the Sanitary Transportation rule if the food enters U.S. commerce.

  
  

If you are a UK or other international producer exporting to the U.S., you must comply with the applicable FSMA requirements as enforced through the U.S. importer. For example, a lettuce grower in Europe shipping to the U.S. must meet the Produce Safety Rule’s standards on water and sanitation, or the importer must verify an equivalent standard under FSVP​.

Consequences of Non-Compliance

Failing to meet FSMA requirements can have serious consequences. FSMA significantly strengthened FDA’s enforcement powers. For instance, FSMA grants FDA mandatory recall authority: if a company fails to voluntarily recall an unsafe food, FDA can order it​. Other potential enforcement actions include:

• Product Detention or Refusal: Non-compliant products can be detained or refused entry at U.S. borders. In fact, under FSMA’s facility registration update, failure to register (or renew registration) is a prohibited act that can lead to U.S. customs refusing the products from that facility​.

• Warning Letters and Fines: FDA can issue warning letters for violations, and it may levy civil monetary penalties for egregious non-compliance.

• Suspension of Registration: FDA can suspend a facility’s registration, effectively banning that company from legally shipping food to the U.S.

• Legal Action: In extreme cases (such as intentional adulteration or fraud), criminal charges could follow. Even without enforcement, non-compliance often leads to recalls, wasted product, lost sales, and damage to reputation.

  
  

In short, the cost of non-compliance can far outweigh the effort to comply: it can mean regulatory shutdown and exclusion from the U.S. market, not to mention the public health impact.

FSMA Updates: Section 204 and Food Traceability

FSMA continues to evolve. A recent major addition is the Food Traceability Final Rule implementing Section 204(d) of FSMA (​fda.gov). Issued in 2021, this rule applies to foods on the FDA’s Food Traceability List (FTL) – certain high-risk foods such as leafy greens, melons, nut butters, certain herbs, and others. The rule requires companies that manufacture, process, pack, or hold these foods to maintain enhanced traceability records (​fda.gov)​.

At a minimum, businesses must record specified Key Data Elements (KDEs) at each Critical Tracking Event (CTE) in the supply chain (e.g. harvest, cooling, packing, shipping) and be able to provide this information to FDA within 24 hours (​fda.gov)​. The FDA notes that this requirement “aligns with current industry best practices” and enables much faster traceback and removal of contaminated products​ (​fda.gov)​. In practice, this means assigning traceability lot codes to batches of covered foods and logging detailed information (source, location, dates, etc.) at every step. The first compliance date for all covered businesses is January 20, 2026, giving firms time to adjust.

FSMA Compliance Checklist

To get started with FSMA compliance, businesses should create an internal checklist tailored to their products. Key items typically include:

• Facility Registration: Confirm your facility is registered with FDA (and schedule your biennial renewal)​.

• Applicable Rules: Identify which FSMA rules apply to your operation (e.g. Produce Safety, Preventive Controls, FSVP, etc.), based on your products and role in the supply chain.

• Food Safety Plan: Develop or update your written Hazard Analysis and Preventive Controls (HARPC) food safety plan. This should include a hazard analysis, preventive controls, monitoring procedures, corrective actions, and a recall plan​.

• Good Practices: Ensure updated CGMPs and sanitation processes are in place (facility cleanliness, staff hygiene training, pest control, etc.).

• Supply-Chain Program: If hazards are controlled by your suppliers, document how you verify them. U.S. importers will need an FSVP plan​ that records how foreign suppliers meet FSMA standards.

• Training: Train your personnel in FSMA requirements. The FDA and partners offer specialized training (e.g. the PCQI course by FSPCA) for those handling preventive controls.

• Recordkeeping: Set up systems to capture and maintain records of all FSMA activities. This includes monitoring logs, batch records, corrective-action records, and (for FTL foods) the specified Key Data Elements at each tracking event​ (​fda.gov). Ensure records are legible, readily accessible, and retained for the required time (often two years).

• Traceability: Assign lot codes and maintain traceability documentation for your products. Confirm that you can quickly trace an item forward and backward through the chain.

• Verification and Update: Plan to periodically audit your FSMA systems and update your plan as needed (for example, when you add new products or processes). Keep an eye on FDA guidance for any new deadlines (such as those for the traceability rule).

  
  

Meeting these checklist items will greatly streamline your FSMA compliance efforts.

FSMA Compliance Statements

There is no single official “FSMA compliance certificate,” but businesses often use compliance statements or affidavits to communicate food safety commitments. In practice, a foreign supplier might provide a written statement (often part of commercial paperwork) affirming that their products are made under conditions meeting FSMA standards (for example, “we adhere to HACCP and GMP as required by U.S. law”). U.S. importers may request such documentation as part of their supplier evaluation under FSVP. These statements typically outline the food safety program in place (e.g. “Our facility is FDA-registered and follows a HACCP-based preventive controls plan”). While these are not required by law, they can reassure buyers and customs officials that the food was produced under FSMA-like controls.

FSMA Training

Yes, there is FSMA-specific training. The FDA and allied organizations offer courses to help businesses comply. For example, the Food Safety Preventive Controls Alliance (FSPCA) provides the FDA-recognized curriculum for the “Preventive Controls Qualified Individual” (PCQI) course – one is required for those preparing Preventive Controls plans for human or animal food. Similarly, there are FSPCA or FDA-approved courses for food defence (Mitigation Strategies), produce safety, and FSVP. These trainings cover the content of the final rules and practical implementation. Many community colleges, extension programs, and private firms also offer FSMA workshops. Taking these courses (and obtaining a certificate of completion) can ensure your team understands FSMA requirements.

Getting and Staying Compliant with FSMA

Achieving FSMA compliance is an ongoing process. First, evaluate your status: classify your facility (e.g. “qualified facility” or not) and determine exactly which rules apply. Conduct a thorough hazard analysis of your products and processes. Develop (or update) your written food safety plan to cover all identified hazards and controls. Implement the plan on the ground: train staff, enforce the controls, and document everything you do. For example, if testing agricultural water for produce safety is needed, put a schedule and logbook in place.

Maintain strong documentation. FSMA is record-focused, so keep clear, organized records of your preventive measures, inspections, maintenance, and trace data. If you export high-risk foods, practice traceability drills (mock recalls) so you know you can quickly generate a traceback using your records. Conduct periodic internal audits to verify your procedures are working and revise your plan if you find gaps.

Modern tools can simplify compliance. For instance, FSMA’s traceability rule requires keeping key data elements (like lot codes, sources, and dates) at each supply-chain step​ (​fda.gov)​.

Digital recordkeeping and traceability software can automatically log this information. FoodSafe, for example, offers features like digital logs, traceability modules, and audit-ready reports that align with FSMA’s requirements.

Its system can capture batch data, assign lot codes, record supplier information, and generate reports on demand. Using such a platform can streamline your paperwork and make it much easier to respond to an FDA inspection or outbreak investigation.

Ultimately, staying compliant means integrating FSMA into your daily operations – using checklists, scheduled reviews, and (if helpful) technology to track compliance items.

FSMA vs UK Food Safety Standards

UK food producers have their own set of safety standards, but the goals are similar. In the UK, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) enforces food safety laws, and businesses typically follow HACCP and good hygiene practice. Schemes like SALSA (Safe and Local Supplier Approval) exist to help small UK producers demonstrate compliance with UK hygiene regulations. Larger UK producers often obtain BRCGS (Global Standards) certification, which is a private-sector standard covering HACCP, hygiene, and quality systems recognized by many retailers.

While SALSA and BRCGS cover many of the same principles (preventive controls, recordkeeping, audits), FSMA is a separate U.S. law with its own requirements and enforcement. UK exporters to the U.S. must comply with FSMA on top of UK rules. For example, a UK farm might be SALSA-approved, but it would still need to meet FSMA’s Produce Safety criteria (or document equivalent controls) to export lettuce to the U.S. Likewise, a UK processor with BRCGS certification would still need to implement FSMA-style preventive controls and be prepared for FDA inspections.

In short, UK standards (FSA regulations, SALSA, BRCGS) can form a strong foundation, but exporters must map those to FSMA’s specific rules. Some UK businesses prepare separate FSMA compliance documents or integrate FSMA checkpoints into their existing food safety management system when targeting the U.S. market. The two systems are compatible in spirit, but different in detail.

FSMA compliance may seem complex, but digital tools can help bridge the gap between UK and U.S. requirements. By using software to manage your food safety plan and records, you can satisfy both FSMA and UK regulators more easily.

Ready to simplify FSMA compliance? FoodSafe’s software was designed for exactly this purpose.

Its digital recordkeeping, traceability tracking, and audit-reporting features align with FSMA requirements to help small producers stay organised and inspection-ready. Sign up for a free trial of FoodSafe today and see how easy it can be to manage your food safety tasks and achieve FSMA compliance with confidence.

Get Started. It's FREE!